Skip to content
Menu

Case studies

Filter by Industry
Industry
Filter by Audience
Audience
Filter by Author
Author
Filter by Hazard type
Hazard type
Filter by Topic
Topic
Selected filters

All case studies

Choose a sort order
  • Barry Bros Specialised Services Pty Ltd (Toxfree Australia)

    The Barry Bros leadership team worked with an IPaM advisor to complete a safety systems assessment, an onsite inspection and a safety climate survey.

  • Plaintiff unsuccessful in proving liability in prison assault

    Eastment v State of Queensland [2018] QCA 253 – Court of Appeal Brisbane The plaintiff, a former correctional officer, was assaulted by a prisoner on 8 March 2009. The plaintiff developed a significant psychiatric injury as a result of the event. Quantum was agreed and the matter proceeded as a liability only trial.

  • Employer found to be directly and vicariously liable for District Chief Executive's bullying

    Robinson v Cape York Hospital and Health Service [2017] QSC 165, 8 August 2017. The employer was both directly and also vicariously liable for their staff's behaviour which included managerial mistreatment, humiliation, undermining and isolation.

  • Injured TV show contestant found to be a ‘worker’

    The New South Wales Workers’ Compensation Commission found that an injured reality TV show contestant was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of workers’ compensation.

  • Credibility suffers from highly inflated claim

    Test v Forgacs Engineering Pty Ltd [2012] QDC 318, 24 October 2012. This case was decided on credibility, where the evidence of the defendant’s witnesses was preferred to that of the Plaintiff.

  • Employer not liable to Fire Fighter for exposure to traumatic scene

    The plaintiff was a Fire Fighter who was on shift on 24 August 2011, when a tragic house fire occurred.

  • Injury due to an unsafe system of work

    Constance v Bush Services Pty Ltd [2013] 24 June 2013. The Court expects employers to take all reasonable precautions to implement and maintain a safe system of work to ensure that workers are not injured while at work.

  • Plaintiff is unsuccessful in proving management action was inappropriate

    Pere v Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service [2017] QDC 002, 27 January 2017. In this case, the Plaintiff was unable to prove there was an assault or that there was any breach of duty by the employer causing compensable loss.

  • Considering genuine occupational requirements

    Chivers v State of Queensland (Queensland Health) [2014]QCA 141 13 June 2014 The Queensland Court of Appeal recently handed down a decision which helps to clarify employers’ responsibilities in considering whether a particular requirement of a position is a genuine occupational requirement, or, whether adjustments should be made to meet the needs of an employee with an impairment or disability.

  • Liability admitted but future economic loss disputed

    Haden v Smith's Snackfood Company Ltd [2013] QMC 1 11 February 2013. The plaintiff won in the Magistrates Court, but the decision was successfully appealed due to an incorrect calculation of damages.

  • Damages awarded for physical and psychological injury

    Harris v State of Queensland [2014] QDC 35 28 February 2014. Liability was admitted by the employer, but a psychiatric injury, which arose after the physical workplace injury, led to the trial to judge the amount of damages.

  • Evidence and symptoms must support damages claim

    Bawden v Proserprine Cooperative Sugar Milling Association Ltd 9 April 2015 [QDC 205]. This case highlights that in the case of a psychiatric injury, that evidence and symptoms must support the damages claim.